Yucatec Maya grammar, step by step

Last updated ·

We'll start with word order, because Yucatec Maya organizes its sentences differently from almost any European language. The verb opens the sentence and the subject trails at the end. Time will be marked through aspect rather than tense, and the person-agreement system will split depending on whether the action is finished — but all of that comes later. First, the upside-down word order.

How a Yucatec Maya sentence is built

1

The verb comes first

verb-first (VOS)
→ verb first, subject last
K
IMPF
-u
3SG.A
janal
eat
le
DEF
xiib
man
-o'
DEF
→ different subject, verb stays first
K
IMPF
-u
3SG.A
janal
eat
le
DEF
paal
child
-o'
DEF
→ with an object: Verb — Object — Subject
K
IMPF
-u
3SG.A
yil
see
-ik
INCOMPL
le
DEF
naj
house
-o'
DEF
le
DEF
xiib
man
-o'
DEF
→ same meaning, but Subject — Verb — Object (also natural)
le
DEF
xiib
man
-o'
DEF
K
IMPF
-u
3SG.A
yil
see
-ik
INCOMPL
le
DEF
naj
house
-o'
DEF
?

In English you say "The man eats" — subject first. Look at the Yucatec Maya sentences below. Where does the verb appear?

Yucatec Maya is verb-initial: the verb typically opens the sentence. The basic order is Verb–Object–Subject (VOS), the mirror image of English. But Yucatec actually has "split word order": when a sentence names both the doer and the thing acted upon, SVO order is just as common — and in everyday speech, even more frequent. When only the subject is expressed (no separate object), verb-first (VS) dominates. Compare the last two examples: same meaning, both natural, different word order. (Don't worry about the k-u prefix yet — we'll explain that in Steps 3–4.)

2

The article wraps the noun

discontinuous article le…o'
→ le…-o' wraps 'house'
le
DEF.L
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
→ le…-o' wraps 'man'
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
-o'
DEF.R
→ adjective + noun, both inside le…-o'
le
DEF.L
nojoch
big
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
NounDefinite formMeaning
najle naj-o'the house
xiible xiib-o'the man
kaajle kaaj-o'the town
paalle paal-o'the child
?

You've seen 'le' appear before nouns and '-o'' appear at the end. Are these two separate words, or two halves of one article?

The Yucatec Maya definite article is discontinuous: le attaches before the noun phrase and -o' closes it from the right. Together le…-o' means 'the.' The noun (and any adjectives) sit between them.

3

Aspect, not tense: táan

progressive aspect
→ táan = event is in progress
Táan
PROG
u
3SG.A
janal
eat
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
-o'
DEF.R
→ táan with seeing
Táan
PROG
u
3SG.A
yil
see
-ik
INCOMPL
le
DEF.L
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
→ habitual: k- replaces táan
K
IMPF
-u
3SG.A
janal
eat
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
-o'
DEF.R
?

English says 'eats' for habit and 'is eating' for right now. Yucatec Maya doesn't shift verb forms for time — it adds a particle before the verb. What particle appears in the examples below?

Yucatec Maya has no tense morphology. Instead, aspect particles signal how an event unfolds. Táan marks an event as in progress right now — similar to English '-ing.' The verb form itself stays the same.

4

Set A prefixes mark the actor

Set A agreement
→ in- = first person actor
Táan
PROG
in
1SG.A
janal
eat
→ a- = second person actor
Táan
PROG
a
2SG.A
janal
eat
→ u- = third person; they = u-…-o'ob discontinuous
Táan
PROG
u
3PL.A
janal
eat
-o'ob
PL
PersonPrefixExampleMeaning
Iin-táan in janalI am eating
youa-táan a janalyou are eating
he/she/itu-táan u janalhe/she is eating
wek-táan k janalwe are eating
theyu-…-o'obtáan u janal-o'obthey are eating
?

Notice that u- appears before the verb when the subject is 'he/she.' What changes when the subject changes to 'I' or 'you'?

In incompletive (ongoing) contexts, a short prefix on the verb marks who the actor is. These are called Set A prefixes. They come right before the verb stem: in- (I), a- (you), u- (he/she/it), k- (we).

5

Completive: the event is done

completive aspect
→ -naj-en = completive, I ate
janal
eat
-naj
CMP
-en
ABS.1SG
→ -naj-ech = completive, you ate
janal
eat
-naj
CMP
-ech
ABS.2SG
→ -naj-ij = completive, he/she/it ate
janal
eat
-naj
CMP
-ij
ABS.3SG
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
-o'
DEF.R
→ j- prefix = completive for movement verbs, I went
j-
CMP
bin
go
-en
ABS.1SG
→ j- prefix + Set B: he/she/it went (with destination)
j-
CMP
bin
go
-ij
ABS.3SG
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
-o'
DEF.R
→ -laj- = completive for positional verbs, I sat down
kul
sit
-laj
CMP.POS
-en
ABS.1SG
PersonSuffixFormMeaning
I-naj-enjanalnajenI ate
you-naj-echjanalnajechyou ate
he/she/it-naj-ijjanalnajijhe/she/it ate
we-naj-o'onjanalnajo'onwe ate
they-naj-o'objanalnajo'obthey ate
?

The prefixes in- a- u- are gone. Instead, something appears at the end of the verb. What is it, and does it vary by person?

When an event is complete, Yucatec Maya switches systems entirely. The aspect particle táan disappears, and a Set B person suffix marks the subject. Different verb classes use different completive markers: activity verbs like janal (eat) take -naj- (janalnajen = I ate), movement verbs like bin (go) take a j- prefix (j-bin-en = I went), and positional verbs like kul (sit) replace their -tal verbalizer with -laj- (kullaj-en = I sat down). The Set B suffixes are: -en (I), -ech (you), -ij (he/she/it), -o'on (we), -o'ob (they). (Heads-up: in everyday speech you may hear a reduced variant of janalnajen — '(j)janen' — where the same lexeme is inflected as a simple root like bin rather than taking the antipassive -naj- shape. Both are attested; stick to janalnajen when you speak, but don't think you misheard if a native speaker says (j)janen. Yoshida 2009 p.xxii.)

6

Transitive verbs take -ik

transitive suffix -ik
→ janal is intransitive: no -ik
Táan
PROG
in
1SG.A
janal
eat
→ wilik is transitive: -ik suffix
Táan
PROG
in
1SG.A
wil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
le
DEF.L
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
→ t'anik (speak to) also transitive
Táan
PROG
u
3SG.A
t'an
speak.to
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
-o'
DEF.R
?

Compare 'táan in janal' (I am eating) with 'táan in wilik' (I am seeing it). The verbs look different at the end. What suffix does the transitive verb 'see' carry?

Transitive verbs — those taking a direct object — carry the suffix -ik in the incompletive. Intransitive verbs like janal (eat) have no such suffix. The -ik marks that there is something being acted upon.

7

Two systems split by completion

split ergativity
→ incompletive intransitive: Set A prefix
Táan
PROG
in
1SG.A
janal
eat
→ completive intransitive: -naj- completive + Set B suffix
janal
eat
-naj
CMP
-en
1SG.B
→ completive transitive: t- prefix + Set A + -aj suffix
t-
COMPL
in
1SG.A
wil
see
-aj
COMPL.TR
le
DEF.L
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
AspectIntransitive subjectTransitive subject
IncompletiveSet A prefix (in janal)Set A prefix (in wilik)
CompletiveCMP + Set B suffix (janal-naj-en)Set A prefix + t- (tin wilaj)
?

Watch 'I ate' (intransitive) vs 'I saw it' (transitive). In both, 'I' is the doer — but compare where and how 'I' is marked in each sentence. Something is different.

Yucatec Maya has split ergativity: the person-marking system changes depending on aspect. In incompletive, Set A (prefix) marks all subjects. In completive, intransitive subjects use Set B (suffix) — but transitive subjects still use Set A (prefix), now with a completive marker t- and the suffix -aj. The doer of a completed intransitive event is marked differently from the doer of a completed transitive event.

8

Negation with ma'

negation ma'
→ progressive negation: ma' … (i') wraps the clause
Ma'
NEG
táan
PROG
in
1SG.A
janal
eat
i'
D4
→ completive negation: ma' + perfective + verb + completive + Set B + i'
Ma'
NEG
j-
PRV
janal
eat
-naj
CMP
-en
1SG.B
i'
D4
→ transitive completive negation: ma' + t- + Set A + verb + -aj + i'
Ma'
NEG
t-
PRV
in
1SG.A
wil
see
-aj
COMPL.TR
le
DEF.L
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
i'
D4
?

A new word appears at the start of some sentences, and the rest of the sentence looks the same. What is it and where exactly does it go?

Negation is bipartite: ma' opens the scope and the clause closes with the clitic i' (glossed D4, sometimes written -i'). For progressive sentences, ma' goes before táan. For completive sentences, ma' goes before the verb and the verb keeps its completive suffix. The rest of the sentence structure stays intact — no auxiliary verb is needed. (Bohnemeyer 2002 §4.2.1.5; E197a p.231; E239a p.272.)

9

Ts'o'ok: already done

ts'o'ok terminative
→ ts'o'ok: I have already eaten
Ts'o'ok
TERM
in
1SG.A
janal
eat
→ ts'o'ok with a transitive verb (incompletive -ik form)
Ts'o'ok
TERM
u
3SG.A
yil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
le
DEF.L
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
→ 'not yet' reading: ma' + subjunctive -nak + Set B + i' (ts'o'ok itself is dropped)
Ma'
NEG
janal
eat
-nak
SUBJ
-en
1SG.B
i'
D4
?

A new particle appears before the verb — ts'o'ok. The verb form that follows uses Set A prefixes, just like the progressive. What does this particle add in meaning?

Ts'o'ok is the terminative aspect particle: it signals that an event is finished and its result is relevant now. It is similar to English 'have already' or 'already finished.' The verb takes its incompletive form after ts'o'ok, with Set A prefixes and -ik for transitive verbs. Ts'o'ok cannot be negated with ma' directly (Bohnemeyer 2002 p.283): the 'not yet' reading is expressed with subjunctive status inside the bipartite ma' … i' frame.

10

Mukah: going to do something

prospective mukah
→ mukah: upcoming event (Set B -en on mukah, Set A deleted)
Mukah
PROSP
-en
B.1SG
janal
eat
→ mukah with a transitive verb: Set A stays, subjunctive status (no -ik)
Mukah
PROSP
a
2SG.A
wil
see.SUBJ
le
DEF.L
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
→ biin: solemn/prophetic variant of mukah
Biin
PRED
in
1SG.A
janal
eat
→ yan: default future for scheduled/obligatory events (Bohnemeyer 2002 §6.2.2.2.1)
Yan
OBL
in
1SG.A
janal
eat.INC
→ aspect summary: four key markers
Táan
PROG
u
3SG.A
janal
eat
/
Ts'o'ok
TERM
u
3SG.A
janal
eat
/
Mukah
PROSP
janal
eat
/
Yan
OBL
u
3SG.A
janal
eat
?

A new marker appears: mukah. It fills the same slot as táan. But look carefully — what happens to the Set A prefix? Does the person marking work the same way?

Mukah marks a prospective ('going to') event — an intention about to unfold. Unlike the other aspect markers, mukah takes Set B person suffixes directly on itself (mukah-en 'I'm going to', mukah-ech 'you're going to'). With intransitive verbs, Set A on the verb disappears. With transitive verbs, Set A stays and the verb shifts to subjunctive status (losing -ik). For scheduled or obligatory events ('I have to'), yan is the default future marker in main clauses — it keeps Set A and incompletive status, just like k- (Bohnemeyer 2002: 7, 296–307). In solemn or prophetic speech, biin is used instead. (Note: short-vowel bin is a separate word meaning 'reportedly'.)

11

Possession: Set A on the noun

noun possession
→ in- prefix on noun = my
in
1SG.POSS
naj
house
→ u- on noun, possessor follows as a noun phrase
u
3SG.POSS
naj
house
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
-o'
DEF.R
→ possession in a full sentence
Táan
PROG
in
1SG.A
wil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
in
1SG.POSS
naj
house
PersonPossessed nounMeaning
in-in najmy house
a-a najyour house
u-u najhis/her house
k-k najour house
u-…-o'obu naj-o'obtheir house
?

We've seen Set A prefixes on verbs. Now look at nouns. Where do those same prefixes appear, and what do they signal?

Possession is marked by a Set A prefix directly on the possessed noun: in naj (my house), a naj (your house), u naj (his/her house). When the possessor is a noun phrase, it follows the possessed noun with its Set A prefix.

12

Classifiers count by animacy

numeral classifiers
→ p'éel for inanimate nouns
jun
one
p'éel
CL.INAN
naj
house
→ túul for animate nouns
jun
one
túul
CL.ANIM
xiib
man
→ classifiers in a full sentence
Táan
PROG
in
1SG.A
wil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
ka'a
two
p'éel
CL.INAN
naj
house
ClassifierUsed forExample
p'éelinanimate objectsjun p'éel naj — one house
p'éelinanimate objectska'a p'éel naj — two houses
túulanimate beingsjun túul xiib — one man
túulanimate beingska'a túul paal — two children
?

When counting, a small word appears between the number and the noun. It seems to differ depending on whether the noun is a person or a thing. What word appears with people, and what word with objects?

Yucatec Maya uses numeral classifiers: a word between the number and the noun that indicates the noun's category. P'éel marks inanimate objects; túul marks animate beings (people, animals). No classifier means no counting — you must choose the right one.

13

Adjectives go before the noun

adjective position
→ adjective before noun (attributive)
le
DEF.L
nojoch
big
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
→ adjective before the NP, outside le…o' (predicative — different meaning)
Nojoch
big
le
DEF.L
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
→ mejen (small) in a full sentence
Táan
PROG
in
1SG.A
wil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
le
DEF.L
mejen
small
naj
house
-o'
DEF.R
?

The adjective appears right before the noun it describes, inside the le…o' article. What would happen if you moved it after the noun?

Attributive adjectives in Yucatec Maya come before the noun: nojoch naj (big house), mejen naj (small house). Both the adjective and noun are wrapped inside le…-o' when definite. If the adjective appears outside le…-o', before the noun phrase, it becomes a predicate: 'Nojoch le najo'' means 'The house is big' — the adjective functions as the main predicate.

14

Questions: question words move to front

question words
→ ba'ax fronted (what are you seeing?)
Ba'ax
what
táan
PROG
a
2SG.A
wil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
?
→ máax fronted (who is eating?)
Máax
who
táan
PROG
u
3SG.A
janal
eat
?
→ wáaj after aspect marker (are you eating?)
Táan
PROG
wáaj
Q
a
2SG.A
janal
eat
?
WordMeaningExample
Ba'axwhatBa'ax táan a wilik? — What are you seeing?
MáaxwhoMáax táan u janal? — Who is eating?
Tu'uxwhereTu'ux táan a janal? — Where are you eating?
wáajyes/no?Táan wáaj a janal? — Are you eating?
?

The sentences below are questions. Look at where the question word appears relative to the verb. Does it stay where the answer would go, or does it move somewhere special?

Question words in Yucatec Maya move to the front of the sentence — to the pre-verbal focus position. Ba'ax (what), Máax (who), and Tu'ux (where) all precede the verb phrase. Yes/no questions use the particle wáaj, placed right after the first predicate element (like the aspect marker).

15

Relative clauses inside le…o'

relative clauses
→ le xiib ku janal o' = the man who eats
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
ku
IMPF.3SG.A
janal
eat
-o'
DEF.R
→ le naj ku t'anik o' = the house he is talking about
le
DEF.L
naj
house
ku
IMPF.3SG.A
t'an
speak.to
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
-o'
DEF.R
→ used in a full sentence
Ts'o'ok
TERM
in
1SG.A
wil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
le
DEF.L
naj
house
ku
IMPF.3SG.A
t'an
speak.to
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
-o'
DEF.R
le
DEF.L
xiib
man
-o'
DEF.R
?

Below, the definite article le…o' seems to contain not just a noun but an entire verb phrase. What is the article doing here?

Relative clauses in Yucatec Maya are embedded inside the definite article le…o'. The verb inside the relative clause uses normal aspect-agreement marking — ku- is k- (imperfective aspect) + u- (3SG Set A), the same markers used in main clauses. There is no special relativizer; the position inside le…o' after the head noun is what signals a relative clause.

16

The full picture

synthesis
→ perfect + transitive + relative clause + possessed noun
Ts'o'ok
TERM
in
1SG.A
t'an
speak.to
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
u
3SG.POSS
naj
house
le
DEF.L
nojoch
big
xiib
man
ku
IMPF.3SG.A
janal
eat
-o'
DEF.R
→ negation + progressive + classifier
Ma'
NEG
táan
PROG
u
3SG.A
yil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
ka'a
two
túul
CL.ANIM
paal
child
→ question with possession (wáaj after aspect marker)
Táan
PROG
wáaj
Q
a
2SG.A
wil
see
-ik
INCOMPL.TR
in
1SG.POSS
naj
house
?
?

Below is a complex Yucatec Maya sentence. Try to identify: the verb position, the aspect particle, the Set A prefix, the relative clause inside le…o', and the possessed noun.

You now know the core skeleton of Yucatec Maya: verb-initial order (VOS for intransitive and event-presentational clauses, with SVO also common when both arguments are overt), aspect markers (táan/ts'o'ok/mukah/yan) that mark ongoing/completed/upcoming/scheduled events, two person-agreement systems (Set A and Set B) that split by aspect and transitivity, the wrapping article le…o', possessive prefixes, numeral classifiers, adjective-first noun phrases, fronted question words, and relative clauses embedded inside the article.

Common questions about Yucatec Maya

What does this Yucatec Maya grammar walkthrough cover?
Sixteen steps built from one sentence: verb-first (VOS) word order, the discontinuous le…o' article, aspect marking with táan, the Set A and Set B person systems, completive aspect, transitive -ik, split ergativity, negation with ma', the ts'o'ok terminative, future markers (mukah, yan), possession, classifiers, prenominal adjectives, question words, and relative clauses.
Does Yucatec Maya have tenses like past, present, and future?
No — it marks aspect instead. táan signals an action is in progress, the completive marks an event as finished, ts'o'ok says something is already done, and mukah or yan point to the future. Time is encoded by what kind of event you're looking at, not when it happened on a clock.
What is split ergativity and where does the walkthrough show it?
Yucatec Maya uses Set A prefixes (in-, a-, u-, k-) to mark the actor in incompletive aspect, but switches to Set B suffixes for the subject of intransitive verbs in completive aspect. The same person can show up two completely different ways depending on aspect — step 7 contrasts them directly.
Why does the article wrap around the noun as le…o'?
The Yucatec Maya definite article is discontinuous: le opens the noun phrase and o' closes it. So 'the man' is le xiibo'. Step 2 introduces it, and step 15 shows that relative clauses get embedded inside the same wrapping.
What are classifiers and why does Yucatec Maya need them?
Numbers can't attach directly to a noun — a classifier sits between them, marking what kind of thing is being counted. p'éel is for inanimates ('two houses' = ka'ap'éel naj), túul is for animates ('two men' = ka'atúul xiib). Step 12 walks through the contrast.
enzhesfrpt