Korean grammar, step by step
A guided tour through Korean grammar with glossed examples that show how each piece of a sentence fits together.
Grammar Walkthrough
Discover how the language works through examples
Korean puts the verb at the end, marks every noun's role with a particle, and threads politeness into every sentence — these three patterns unlock the whole grammar.
The polite verb ending
-(아/어)요 form| Verb | Stem | Polite present | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 말하다 | 말하- | 말해요 | speak |
| 먹다 | 먹- | 먹어요 | eat |
| 보다 | 보- | 봐요 | see |
All three verbs below end with -요. What does this ending signal? And notice: the ending does not change between "I speak" and "she speaks."
The -아요/-어요 ending marks polite speech. It is the same for all persons — Korean verb forms do not agree with who is doing the action, only with formality level. -아요 follows bright vowels (ㅏ/ㅗ); -어요 follows all others.
SOV: verb always last
SOV word orderWhere is the verb in each sentence? What sits between the subject and the verb?
Korean is Subject–Object–Verb: the verb always comes at the very end of the clause. Every other element — objects, time words, location phrases — must appear before it.
Topic vs. subject markers
topic vs. subject| Particle | After consonant | After vowel | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | 은 | 는 | known info / contrast |
| Subject | 이 | 가 | new info / emphasis |
Two different particles appear after nouns in subject position. When does 은/는 appear, and when does 이/가? Compare what the speaker is doing with the information in each sentence.
은/는 (topic marker) frames what the sentence is about — typically known or contrasted information. 이/가 (subject marker) highlights new information or puts focus on who performs the action. Both follow vowel and consonant stems differently.
Object marker: 을/를
object marker| Object (consonant final) | Object (vowel final) |
|---|---|
| 밥을 (rice-OBJ) | 한국어를 (Korean-OBJ) |
| 책을 (book-OBJ) | 영화를 (movie-OBJ) |
What particle appears directly after the direct object in each sentence? Does it stay the same regardless of what the object is?
을/를 marks the direct object. 을 attaches after a consonant-final syllable; 를 attaches after a vowel-final syllable. The particle, not word order, tells you what is being acted on.
Location particles: 에 vs. 에서
location particles| Particle | Use | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 에 | destination or existence | 학교에 가요 — go to school |
| 에 | location of existence | 집에 있어요 — is at home |
| 에서 | location of action | 학교에서 말해요 — speak at school |
| 에서…까지 | from…to | 서울에서 부산까지 — from Seoul to Busan |
Both sentences use 학교 (school), but different particles follow it. What is different about the action in each sentence — and how does the particle match that difference?
에 marks a destination (going to) or location of existence (being at). 에서 marks the location where an action takes place. The same place takes a different particle depending on whether you are moving there, being there, or doing something there.
Past tense: -았/었어요
past tense| Verb | Present | Past | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 말하다 | 말해요 | 말했어요 | speak |
| 먹다 | 먹어요 | 먹었어요 | eat |
| 가다 | 가요 | 갔어요 | go |
| 보다 | 봐요 | 봤어요 | see |
What changed between 말해요 (now) and 말했어요 (before)? Can you see the same pattern in 먹었어요 and 갔어요?
Past tense is formed by inserting -았- (after ㅏ/ㅗ vowel stems) or -었- (all others) before the polite -어요 ending. The same ending is used for all persons — no agreement by person or gender.
Future and intention
future| Verb | Future form | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 말하다 | 말할 거예요 | will speak |
| 먹다 | 먹을 거예요 | will eat |
| 가다 | 갈 거예요 | will go |
How is future time expressed here — is it a different verb form or an extra element added after the verb stem?
-(으)ㄹ 거예요 expresses future plans or predictions. The modifier ending -(으)ㄹ attaches to the verb stem (ㄹ after vowel stems; 을 after consonant stems), followed by the noun 거 (thing/fact) and the copula 예요. It literally means "it will be the case of doing."
Three ways to negate
negation| Type | Form | Example |
|---|---|---|
| General | 안 + verb | 안 말해요 — don't speak |
| Emphatic | stem + -지 않아요 | 말하지 않아요 — don't speak |
| Inability | 못 + verb | 못 말해요 — can't speak |
| Non-existence | 없어요 | 시간이 없어요 — there is no time |
Three different negation strategies appear below. What is each one adding or changing — and what is the difference between not wanting to do something and not being able to?
Korean has three negation forms: 안 before the verb (short, general), -지 않아요 after the stem (slightly more emphatic), and 못 before the verb (inability). 없다 (to not exist / not have) is the negative counterpart of 있다.
Copula and adjective predicates
copulaThe adjective 크다 (to be big) behaves exactly like a verb in these sentences — it takes the same polite endings. How is that different from how adjectives work in a language you know?
Korean adjectives are stative verbs — they conjugate for tense and politeness just like action verbs, and they serve as predicates on their own without a separate "to be." The copula 이다 (to be) links nouns to their identity; 아니다 is its negative.
Possession 의 and noun compounds
possessionThe possessive particle 의 appears in the first example, but in the second it is dropped entirely. What holds the relationship together when the particle is absent?
의 (ui) marks possession and corresponds to English "'s" or "of." In casual speech it is frequently omitted — context and word order make the relationship clear. Nouns can also stack directly into compounds without any particle.
Progressive: -고 있어요
progressiveHow is an ongoing action different from a simple present action in Korean? What extra element signals that something is happening right now?
-고 있어요 marks a progressive action: the connective -고 links the verb stem to 있어요 (to exist/be), literally "existing in the state of doing." The same pattern forms past progressives with -고 있었어요.
Connective endings linking clauses
connective endings| Ending | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| -고 | and / then | 먹고 말해요 — eat and speak |
| -(아/어)서 | because / by doing | 일이 있어서 못 가요 — can't go because of work |
| -(으)면 | if | 배우면 좋겠어요 — it would be good if (I) learn |
Three different endings connect the first clause to the second. What relationship does each one signal — sequence, cause, or condition?
-고 lists or sequences actions ("and then"). -(아/어)서 expresses cause or a method ("because" / "by doing") and cannot appear in the past tense. -(으)면 introduces a condition ("if").
Honorifics: three speech levels
honorifics| Level | "I speak" | Use context |
|---|---|---|
| Formal (합쇼체) | 말합니다 | announcements, presentations, strangers |
| Polite (해요체) | 말해요 | everyday polite, default for learners |
| Informal (반말) | 말해 | close friends, children, oneself |
The same sentence "I speak Korean" appears three times with different endings. What changes between the levels — and what stays the same?
Korean threads politeness into every verb form. 해요체 (polite informal) is used in most everyday situations. 합쇼체 (formal) appears in presentations and formal writing. 반말 (plain/informal) is used with close friends or children. Pronouns also shift: 저 (humble "I") in polite speech, 나 (plain "I") in informal.
Want and can: modals
modalsHow does Korean express ability and desire — are these separate verbs, verb endings, or something attached to the main verb?
Ability uses -(으)ㄹ 수 있어요 ("there is a way to do"), negated with -(으)ㄹ 수 없어요. Desire uses -고 싶어요 ("want to do"). To suggest trying something, -아/어 보다 is used ("do and see").
Relative clauses before nouns
relative clauses| Tense/aspect | Modifier ending | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Past / completed | -(으)ㄴ | 말한 사람 — the person who spoke |
| Present / ongoing | -는 | 말하는 사람 — the person who speaks |
| Future / potential | -(으)ㄹ | 말할 사람 — the person who will speak |
The clause describing the noun comes before the noun instead of after it. How does Korean signal where the clause ends and the noun begins?
Korean relative clauses precede the noun they modify. A modifier ending replaces the final verb: -(으)ㄴ for completed/past actions, -는 for present ongoing actions, and -(으)ㄹ for future or potential actions. The noun immediately follows the modifier ending.
The full picture
putting it togetherHow many grammar patterns from earlier steps can you identify in this sentence?
Korean grammar is particles, verb-final order, and speech level working together as a system. Once you can see particles marking roles, modifier endings building clauses, and the polite ending closing every verb, you can decode and build complex sentences.