Hakka Chinese grammar, step by step

Last updated ·

We'll start with the verb — or rather, with the fact that it never changes. Hakka verbs have no conjugation: same form for every person, tense, and number. All the grammatical work is done by particles and word order, layered onto a six-tone system where pitch is part of the word itself.

How a Hakka Chinese sentence is built

1

The verb never changes

no inflection
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
2SG — ngì
speak — góng
3SG — gì
speak — góng
?

The verb 講 (góng, "speak") is identical in all three sentences. No matter who is speaking, does it ever change form?

Hakka verbs have zero inflection — no conjugation, no endings, no agreement. The verb 講 stays the same whether the subject is I, you, or he/she/they. Person, number, and tense are expressed through separate words and context, never through changes to the verb.

2

Adding an object after the verb

SVO word order
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
3SG — gì
speak — góng
英文
English — Yîn-vùn
→ new verb, same SVO order
𠊎
1SG — ngài
read — thuk
book — sû
?

What comes after the verb? Compare the word order with English — is it the same?

Hakka word order is Subject-Verb-Object, the same as English. "𠊎講客家話" maps directly to "I speak Hakka." No articles or case markers are needed — just subject, verb, object in sequence.

3

Six tones change the meaning

tones
→ same consonant/vowel, different tones
sṳ̂ — poem (tone 1)
sṳ̀ — time (tone 2)
→ entering tones are short and clipped (end in -p, -t, -k)
sṳt — know (tone 5, 陰入)
ToneNameContourExampleMeaning
1 (陰平)yīn píngmid level [44]詩 sṳ̂poem
2 (陽平)yáng pínglow level [11]時 sṳ̀time
3 (上聲)shǎngmid-low falling [31]死 sídie
4 (去聲)high falling [53]事 sṳmatter
5 (陰入)yīn rùshort high [1]識 sṳtknow
6 (陽入)yáng rùshort low [5]食 sṳ̍teat
?

Each row in the table uses the same consonant and vowel, but a different pitch contour. What happens to the meaning when the pitch changes?

Meixian Hakka has six lexical tones. Changing the pitch on the same syllable produces an entirely different word — tone is as meaningful as the consonants and vowels themselves.

4

A counting word before every noun

classifiers
one — yit
CL — ke
person — ngìn
three — sâm
CL.book — pún
book — sû
→ demonstrative + classifier
that — kài
CL.animal — chak
dog — kiéu
ClassifierHakkaUsed for
kepeople, general objects
púnbooks, volumes
thiàulong thin things
chakanimals, single items
chôngflat things (paper, tables)
?

Between the number and the noun, an extra word always appears. It changes depending on the noun. What role is it playing?

Hakka requires a classifier (measure word) between a number or demonstrative and a noun. The most common general classifier is 個 (ke), used for people and general objects. Other classifiers match the noun by shape or category.

5

Marking a completed action

aspect: 了 completed
→ no marker: habitual / general
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ 了 after verb: completed action
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
COMPL — liáu
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ 過 (ko) marks experience: "have ever done"
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
EXP — ko
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
?

Example 1 has no extra particle and describes a habit. Example 2 adds 了 (liáu) after the verb. What does 了 signal — is it past tense, or something else?

了 (liáu) after a verb marks a completed action, not past tense. The distinction matters: you can use 了 with future events that will be completed. Hakka also uses 忒 (thêt) as an alternative completion marker in some dialects.

6

Two ways to say no

negation: 毋 and 無
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ 毋 (m̀): general negation
𠊎
1SG — ngài
NEG — m̀
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ 無 (mò): negates completed action (replaces 了)
𠊎
1SG — ngài
NEG.PFV — mò
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
?

Example 2 uses 毋 (m̀) before the verb for a general negation. Example 3 uses 無 (mò). What determines which negation word to use?

毋 (m̀) is the general negator — it negates habits, states, and willingness. 無 (mò) negates completed actions and possession. The rule: 毋 for present/general, 無 for completed events and "do not have."

7

Asking questions two ways

V-not-V questions
→ 有無: V-not-V yes/no question
2SG — ngì
have — yû
NEG — mò
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ question word in-situ: 麼个 (mak-ke, "what")
2SG — ngì
speak — góng
麼个
what — mak-ke
→ 麼人 (mak-ngìn, "who") in-situ
麼人
who — mak-ngìn
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
?

Example 1 places the verb in positive form and then repeats it in negative form. Example 2 uses a question word that sits where the answer would go. How is each question formed?

Hakka yes/no questions use a V-not-V pattern: repeat the verb with its negator. "有無講?" (yû-mò góng) literally asks "have-not-have spoken?" For information questions, question words stay in-situ — they sit in the same position as the answer.

8

Particles that set the mood

sentence-final particles
→ 喔 (ô): softening, gentle affirmation
𠊎
1SG — ngài
know — sṳt
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
SFP.soft — ô
→ 啊 (â): emphasis or exclamation
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
really — chṳ̂n
good — hó
SFP.emph — â
→ 嘛 (mà): "obviously" / "of course"
𠊎
1SG — ngài
COP — he
客家人
Hakka person — Hak-kâ-ngìn
SFP.obvious — mà
?

Each sentence ends with a different particle. The core meaning stays the same, but the tone of voice changes. What does each particle add?

Hakka sentence-final particles add pragmatic nuance without changing the core meaning. 喔 (ô) softens a statement or adds gentle assertion, 啊 (â) adds emphasis or exclamation, and 嘛 (mà) signals that something should be obvious.

9

Two ways to say "is"

copula 係 and stative verbs
→ 係 + noun: identity
3SG — gì
COP — he
先生
teacher — siên-sâng
→ adjective as stative verb (no 係)
3SG — gì
very — tông
tall — kô
→ negating identity: 毋係
3SG — gì
NEG — m̀
COP — he
先生
teacher — siên-sâng
?

Example 1 uses 係 (he) to link a subject to a noun. Example 2 describes a quality without 係 — the adjective acts like a verb on its own. Why can't you say *佢係高?

係 (he) is the copula, linking a subject to a noun for identity: 佢係先生 (he/she/they is a teacher). Adjectives in Hakka are stative verbs — they predicate directly without a copula. Adding 真 (chṳ̂n, "really") or 當 (tông, "very") before an adjective is common.

10

Having and existing with 有

possession and existence: 有
→ possession: have
𠊎
1SG — ngài
have — yû
one — yit
CL.book — pún
book — sû
→ existence: there is
這位
here — liá-vi
exist — yû
person — ngìn
→ negation: 無 (mò), never 毋有
𠊎
1SG — ngài
NEG.have — mò
book — sû
?

有 (yû) appears in two different roles: once to show that someone owns something, and once to say something exists at a place. How do you negate it?

有 (yû) expresses both possession ("to have") and existence ("there is/are"). Its negative is always 無 (mò), never 毋有. This parallels Mandarin 有/没有, but Hakka uses 無 rather than 沒.

11

Start with what you mean

topic-comment
→ standard SVO
𠊎
1SG — ngài
know — sṳt
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ topic-comment: object fronted as topic
客家話
TOP — Hak-kâ-fa
𠊎
1SG — ngài
know — sṳt
speak — góng
→ topic can be any noun phrase
that — kài
CL.book — pún
book — sû
𠊎
1SG — ngài
read — thuk
COMPL — liáu
?

In example 2, 客家話 has moved from its normal object position (after the verb) to the very front. Why would you move it there?

Hakka is a topic-prominent language. Any element can be fronted as the "topic" — what the sentence is about — followed by a "comment" about it. No special marker is needed; word order alone signals the topic.

12

Chaining actions in sequence

serial verb constructions
𠊎
1SG — ngài
go — hi
學校
school — ho̍k-kâu
study — thuk
book — sû
3SG — gì
sit — chhô
vehicle — chhâ
come — lòi
𠊎
1SG — ngài
use — yung
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
speak — góng
?

These sentences have two or three verbs in a row with no connecting words between them. How do you know the order of actions?

Hakka chains verbs together without conjunctions. The verbs occur in the sequence the actions happen: 𠊎去學校讀書 = "I go (to) school (and) study." The first verb typically expresses motion or manner, and the second is the main purpose.

13

The result is built into the verb

resultative complements
→ resultative: action + result
𠊎
1SG — ngài
listen — thâng
RVC.succeed — tó
COMPL — liáu
→ 毋 inserted: unable to achieve the result
𠊎
1SG — ngài
listen — thâng
NEG — m̀
RVC.succeed — tó
→ 看完 (khon-vàn): read + finish
𠊎
1SG — ngài
read — khon
RVC.finish — vàn
COMPL — liáu
that — kài
CL.book — pún
book — sû
?

In 聽著, two characters fuse into one unit. The first means "listen" and the second means "perceive/succeed." What does the combination express — and what happens when 毋 is inserted between them?

Hakka builds compound verbs by attaching a result to an action: 聽 (thâng, listen) + 著 (tó, succeed/perceive) = 聽著 (listened and understood). Insert 毋 to express inability: 聽毋著 (cannot understand). This potential form is the standard way to express ability and inability in Hakka.

14

Modifiers always come before the noun

relative clauses with 个
→ possession with 个
𠊎
1SG — ngài
MOD — ke
book — sû
→ relative clause: whole sentence becomes a modifier
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
MOD — ke
語言
language — ngì-ngièn
→ adjective + 个 + noun
new — sîn
MOD — ke
book — sû
?

In example 2, an entire clause ("I speak") appears before the noun "language," connected by 个 (ke). Where does the modifying clause sit — before or after the noun?

Hakka relative clauses precede the noun they modify, connected by 个 (ke). The pattern is always [modifier clause] + 个 + [noun]. This same 个 also marks possession: 𠊎个書 (my book).

15

The full picture

putting it together
→ the spine: serial verbs (識 + 講) + object
𠊎
1SG — ngài
know — sṳt
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ topic-comment + resultative + classifier + SFP
that — kài
CL — ke
person — ngìn
speak — góng
MOD — ke
language — fa
𠊎
1SG — ngài
listen — thâng
NEG — m̀
RVC — tó
SFP — ô
→ serial verbs + completion + possession + experiential
3SG — gì
have — yû
go — hi
EXP — ko
梅縣
Meixian — Mòi-yen
also — ya
know — sṳt
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
?

How many grammar patterns from earlier steps can you identify in these sentences? Try naming each one before reading the translation.

Hakka grammar is particles, word order, and tone — no inflection anywhere. Once you can see how 了/過 mark aspect, how 毋/無 negate, how 个 modifies, how topic-comment restructures, and how serial verbs chain actions, you can decode and construct complex Hakka sentences.

Common questions about Hakka Chinese

What does this Hakka Chinese grammar walkthrough cover?
Fifteen steps built from one sentence: the absence of inflection, SVO word order, six tones, classifiers, the post-verbal completion marker 了 (liáu), the 毋/無 negation contrast, V-not-V and in-situ questions, sentence-final particles, the copula 係 (he), 有 for possession and existence, topic-comment structure, serial verbs, resultative complements, relative clauses with 个 (ke), and a synthesis step.
What's the difference between 毋 and 無?
毋 (m̀) is the everyday negator for verbs and statives ('I don't know'). 無 (mò) covers existence ('there isn't any') and replaces 有 in completed events ('I haven't eaten'). Picking the right one is one of the first hurdles for learners. Step 6 walks through the contrast.
How is Hakka different from Mandarin and Cantonese?
All three are Sinitic and share SVO order, classifiers, and aspect particles. Hakka has six tones (Mandarin four, Cantonese six but different inventory), uses 毋 instead of 不, has its own everyday vocabulary, and preserves Middle Chinese consonant features the others have lost. Step 1 walks through what makes a sentence sound distinctly Hakka.
What does 个 do in Hakka?
个 (ke) marks the boundary between a modifier and a head noun, including in relative clauses: '𠊎食个东西' literally reads 'I eat ke thing' and means 'the thing I eat'. It plays the same role Mandarin's 的 plays. Step 14 walks through the construction.
Where is Hakka spoken?
Across Guangdong, Fujian, Jiangxi, and Hainan in mainland China, plus large communities in Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, and global diasporas. Hakka has roughly 30 to 40 million speakers worldwide.
enzhesfrpt