Hakka Chinese grammar, step by step

A guided tour through Hakka Chinese grammar with glossed examples that show how each piece of a sentence fits together.

Grammar Walkthrough

Discover how the language works through examples

Hakka Chinese has no conjugation, no declension, and no grammatical gender — verbs never change form, and meaning is built through word order, particles, and context, all layered on top of a six-tone system where pitch is part of the word itself.

1

The verb never changes

no inflection
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
2SG — ngì
speak — góng
3SG — gì
speak — góng
?

The verb 講 (góng, "speak") is identical in all three sentences. No matter who is speaking, does it ever change form?

Hakka verbs have zero inflection — no conjugation, no endings, no agreement. The verb 講 stays the same whether the subject is I, you, or he/she/they. Person, number, and tense are expressed through separate words and context, never through changes to the verb.

2

Adding an object after the verb

SVO word order
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
3SG — gì
speak — góng
英文
English — Yîn-vùn
→ new verb, same SVO order
𠊎
1SG — ngài
read — thuk
book — sû
?

What comes after the verb? Compare the word order with English — is it the same?

Hakka word order is Subject-Verb-Object, the same as English. "𠊎講客家話" maps directly to "I speak Hakka." No articles or case markers are needed — just subject, verb, object in sequence.

3

Six tones change the meaning

tones
→ same consonant/vowel, different tones
sṳ̂ — poem (tone 1)
sṳ̀ — time (tone 2)
→ entering tones are short and clipped (end in -p, -t, -k)
sṳt — know (tone 5, 陰入)
ToneNameContourExampleMeaning
1 (陰平)yīn píngmid level [44]詩 sṳ̂poem
2 (陽平)yáng pínglow level [11]時 sṳ̀time
3 (上聲)shǎngmid-low falling [31]死 sídie
4 (去聲)high falling [53]事 sṳmatter
5 (陰入)yīn rùshort high [1]識 sṳtknow
6 (陽入)yáng rùshort low [5]食 sṳ̍teat
?

Each row in the table uses the same consonant and vowel, but a different pitch contour. What happens to the meaning when the pitch changes?

Meixian Hakka has six lexical tones. Changing the pitch on the same syllable produces an entirely different word — tone is as meaningful as the consonants and vowels themselves.

4

A counting word before every noun

classifiers
one — yit
CL — ke
person — ngìn
three — sâm
CL.book — pún
book — sû
→ demonstrative + classifier
that — kài
CL.animal — chak
dog — kiéu
ClassifierHakkaUsed for
kepeople, general objects
púnbooks, volumes
thiàulong thin things
chakanimals, single items
chôngflat things (paper, tables)
?

Between the number and the noun, an extra word always appears. It changes depending on the noun. What role is it playing?

Hakka requires a classifier (measure word) between a number or demonstrative and a noun. The most common general classifier is 個 (ke), used for people and general objects. Other classifiers match the noun by shape or category.

5

Marking a completed action

aspect: 了 completed
→ no marker: habitual / general
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ 了 after verb: completed action
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
COMPL — liáu
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ 過 (ko) marks experience: "have ever done"
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
EXP — ko
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
?

Example 1 has no extra particle and describes a habit. Example 2 adds 了 (liáu) after the verb. What does 了 signal — is it past tense, or something else?

了 (liáu) after a verb marks a completed action, not past tense. The distinction matters: you can use 了 with future events that will be completed. Hakka also uses 忒 (thêt) as an alternative completion marker in some dialects.

6

Two ways to say no

negation: 毋 and 無
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ 毋 (m̀): general negation
𠊎
1SG — ngài
NEG — m̀
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ 無 (mò): negates completed action (replaces 了)
𠊎
1SG — ngài
NEG.PFV — mò
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
?

Example 2 uses 毋 (m̀) before the verb for a general negation. Example 3 uses 無 (mò). What determines which negation word to use?

毋 (m̀) is the general negator — it negates habits, states, and willingness. 無 (mò) negates completed actions and possession. The rule: 毋 for present/general, 無 for completed events and "do not have."

7

Asking questions two ways

V-not-V questions
→ 有無: V-not-V yes/no question
2SG — ngì
have — yû
NEG — mò
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ question word in-situ: 麼个 (mak-ke, "what")
2SG — ngì
speak — góng
麼个
what — mak-ke
→ 麼人 (mak-ngìn, "who") in-situ
麼人
who — mak-ngìn
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
?

Example 1 places the verb in positive form and then repeats it in negative form. Example 2 uses a question word that sits where the answer would go. How is each question formed?

Hakka yes/no questions use a V-not-V pattern: repeat the verb with its negator. "有無講?" (yû-mò góng) literally asks "have-not-have spoken?" For information questions, question words stay in-situ — they sit in the same position as the answer.

8

Particles that set the mood

sentence-final particles
→ 喔 (ô): softening, gentle affirmation
𠊎
1SG — ngài
know — sṳt
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
SFP.soft — ô
→ 啊 (â): emphasis or exclamation
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
really — chṳ̂n
good — hó
SFP.emph — â
→ 嘛 (mà): "obviously" / "of course"
𠊎
1SG — ngài
COP — he
客家人
Hakka person — Hak-kâ-ngìn
SFP.obvious — mà
?

Each sentence ends with a different particle. The core meaning stays the same, but the tone of voice changes. What does each particle add?

Hakka sentence-final particles add pragmatic nuance without changing the core meaning. 喔 (ô) softens a statement or adds gentle assertion, 啊 (â) adds emphasis or exclamation, and 嘛 (mà) signals that something should be obvious.

9

Two ways to say "is"

copula 係 and stative verbs
→ 係 + noun: identity
3SG — gì
COP — he
先生
teacher — siên-sâng
→ adjective as stative verb (no 係)
3SG — gì
very — tông
tall — kô
→ negating identity: 毋係
3SG — gì
NEG — m̀
COP — he
先生
teacher — siên-sâng
?

Example 1 uses 係 (he) to link a subject to a noun. Example 2 describes a quality without 係 — the adjective acts like a verb on its own. Why can't you say *佢係高?

係 (he) is the copula, linking a subject to a noun for identity: 佢係先生 (he/she/they is a teacher). Adjectives in Hakka are stative verbs — they predicate directly without a copula. Adding 真 (chṳ̂n, "really") or 當 (tông, "very") before an adjective is common.

10

Having and existing with 有

possession and existence: 有
→ possession: have
𠊎
1SG — ngài
have — yû
one — yit
CL.book — pún
book — sû
→ existence: there is
這位
here — liá-vi
exist — yû
person — ngìn
→ negation: 無 (mò), never 毋有
𠊎
1SG — ngài
NEG.have — mò
book — sû
?

有 (yû) appears in two different roles: once to show that someone owns something, and once to say something exists at a place. How do you negate it?

有 (yû) expresses both possession ("to have") and existence ("there is/are"). Its negative is always 無 (mò), never 毋有. This parallels Mandarin 有/没有, but Hakka uses 無 rather than 沒.

11

Start with what you mean

topic-comment
→ standard SVO
𠊎
1SG — ngài
know — sṳt
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ topic-comment: object fronted as topic
客家話
TOP — Hak-kâ-fa
𠊎
1SG — ngài
know — sṳt
speak — góng
→ topic can be any noun phrase
that — kài
CL.book — pún
book — sû
𠊎
1SG — ngài
read — thuk
COMPL — liáu
?

In example 2, 客家話 has moved from its normal object position (after the verb) to the very front. Why would you move it there?

Hakka is a topic-prominent language. Any element can be fronted as the "topic" — what the sentence is about — followed by a "comment" about it. No special marker is needed; word order alone signals the topic.

12

Chaining actions in sequence

serial verb constructions
𠊎
1SG — ngài
go — hi
學校
school — ho̍k-kâu
study — thuk
book — sû
3SG — gì
sit — chhô
vehicle — chhâ
come — lòi
𠊎
1SG — ngài
use — yung
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
speak — góng
?

These sentences have two or three verbs in a row with no connecting words between them. How do you know the order of actions?

Hakka chains verbs together without conjunctions. The verbs occur in the sequence the actions happen: 𠊎去學校讀書 = "I go (to) school (and) study." The first verb typically expresses motion or manner, and the second is the main purpose.

13

The result is built into the verb

resultative complements
→ resultative: action + result
𠊎
1SG — ngài
listen — thâng
RVC.succeed — tó
COMPL — liáu
→ 毋 inserted: unable to achieve the result
𠊎
1SG — ngài
listen — thâng
NEG — m̀
RVC.succeed — tó
→ 看完 (khon-vàn): read + finish
𠊎
1SG — ngài
read — khon
RVC.finish — vàn
COMPL — liáu
that — kài
CL.book — pún
book — sû
?

In 聽著, two characters fuse into one unit. The first means "listen" and the second means "perceive/succeed." What does the combination express — and what happens when 毋 is inserted between them?

Hakka builds compound verbs by attaching a result to an action: 聽 (thâng, listen) + 著 (tó, succeed/perceive) = 聽著 (listened and understood). Insert 毋 to express inability: 聽毋著 (cannot understand). This potential form is the standard way to express ability and inability in Hakka.

14

Modifiers always come before the noun

relative clauses with 个
→ possession with 个
𠊎
1SG — ngài
MOD — ke
book — sû
→ relative clause: whole sentence becomes a modifier
𠊎
1SG — ngài
speak — góng
MOD — ke
語言
language — ngì-ngièn
→ adjective + 个 + noun
new — sîn
MOD — ke
book — sû
?

In example 2, an entire clause ("I speak") appears before the noun "language," connected by 个 (ke). Where does the modifying clause sit — before or after the noun?

Hakka relative clauses precede the noun they modify, connected by 个 (ke). The pattern is always [modifier clause] + 个 + [noun]. This same 个 also marks possession: 𠊎个書 (my book).

15

The full picture

putting it together
→ the spine: serial verbs (識 + 講) + object
𠊎
1SG — ngài
know — sṳt
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
→ topic-comment + resultative + classifier + SFP
that — kài
CL — ke
person — ngìn
speak — góng
MOD — ke
language — fa
𠊎
1SG — ngài
listen — thâng
NEG — m̀
RVC — tó
SFP — ô
→ serial verbs + completion + possession + experiential
3SG — gì
have — yû
go — hi
EXP — ko
梅縣
Meixian — Mòi-yen
also — ya
know — sṳt
speak — góng
客家話
Hakka — Hak-kâ-fa
?

How many grammar patterns from earlier steps can you identify in these sentences? Try naming each one before reading the translation.

Hakka grammar is particles, word order, and tone — no inflection anywhere. Once you can see how 了/過 mark aspect, how 毋/無 negate, how 个 modifies, how topic-comment restructures, and how serial verbs chain actions, you can decode and construct complex Hakka sentences.

enzhesfrpt